2012년 10월 24일 수요일

Energy Crisis and the War



It seems like the Crisis and the War.
The Crisis: We, energy consumer, almost burned out Energy source or fuel of earth.
To make things worse, there has enacted changing of climate such as Global Warming, Rising Sea-levels.
The War: People divided into two groups. Some people insist that Global Warming certainly exists and we should reduce the usage of fossil fuels for environment. To do this, according to their opinion, we should use an Alternative Energy or Green Energy.
The other group insists that Global Warming is non-exist phenomenon and phenomenon of changing of climate is temporary and it will find its place soon.
Also, according to their opinion, we do not need pay for other energy and we just can use previous kind of energy source from which is undiscovered.
Naturally, the basement of the issue is intertwined with political debates.






 
 

The Republican has second view, especially Mitt Romney. According to article of Yahoo news “Romney energy plan aims to expand drilling on federal land,” he insists that weakening the regulations on the energy industry will benefit for U.S citizen and it could make more jobs in the future.

They said changing the energy supply system from existing systems to new one (which is cleaner system) is cost too much and it will be huge waste.

Plus, according to article “The new gas boom,” in the Marcellus Shale could contain as much as 516 trillion cubic feet of natural gas so he insists that we do not have to pay for new system.

Also, according to article of Yahoo news “Romney energy plan aims to expand drilling on federal land,” he wants to build the “Keystone pipeline” for which help bringing more oil from Canada and Mexico.


video about KEY STONE PIPE LINE http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/cbsnews_player_embed.swf
However I do not agree that Idea about Energy Policy. I think that is waste too, the idea of building pipe line. And also, according to article "TAUBE: How Romney could save the Keystone pipeline", that idea is unproven.

I also do not think Global Warming or Change of Climate certainly exist. In many scientist in Korea, have pointed out changing ecosystems and they insist the cause of changing is Global Warming.

On the contrary, according to article “Climate events are not proof of global warming,” the climate events that are pointed out for the proof of global warming are not proof for that.





 

댓글 1개:

  1. Yeryeong,

    Good post! I like that you included lots of quotes from the articles. These are good facts from experts that help strengthen your arguments.

    You have a great into and opposing viewpoint paragraph.

    Your analysis is good, too.

    Great design.


    GR: 95

    답글삭제